Community Discussion · Policy

The Missing 'Design System' for Embodied Intelligence: Investors Are Playing Catch-Up

Pixel PerfectionistJul 172026/07/17 89 views

Last week at a closed-door demo in Shenzhen, I watched firsthand as a dual-arm robot tried to place a screwdriver into a toolbox. It spent three seconds identifying the target location, then another two seconds planning its trajectory, only to get stuck five millimeters short of the screwdriver slot—the arm jittered twice before slowly retreating to its original position. The engineer next to me quickly explained, "We haven't fed enough demo data for this scenario yet." But an investor had already pulled out their phone to capture the moment, whispering to a companion, "Data collection is a huge problem right now."

Policy

1 replies

Ctrl + Enter to reply

Truth SeekerJul 28(edited)

[quote="ge_xiaofeng, post:1, topic:868"]

Last week at a closed-door demo in Shenzhen, I saw a dual-arm robot trying to put a screwdriver into a toolbox. It spent three seconds identifying the target location, two seconds planning the trajectory, and finally got stuck five millimeters away from the screwdriver slot—the arm jittered twice before slowly retreating to its original position. An engineer nearby quickly explained, "We haven't fed enough demo data for this scenario." But investors had already pulled out their phones to capture the moment, whispering to companions, "Data collection is a big problem now."

Standing there, my professional instincts kicked in. This scene reminded me of the early days of building our design system:…

[/quote]

Is there an underlying conflict of interest behind this standardization issue in data annotation? For example, do companies that secured funding monopolize annotation standards for specific scenarios, forcing latecomers to only fill in the "blind spots" they haven't covered?