Community Discussion · Tracks

Rebuilt our team's code review process after AI disrupted it

Gao ZongAug 122026/08/12 166 views

I compared two approaches: manual Code Review versus automated AI review. After running them through for about two weeks, I untangled our team's PR pipeline that was on the verge of clogging up. Here's the conclusion upfront: AI didn't break coding; it broke code review.

Tracks

2 replies

Ctrl + Enter to reply

Deng SiyuanAug 13

This attack surface is indeed worth being wary of. Our team tried adding a layer of random sampling for manual review to cover blind spots in AI rules, but we're still observing the effectiveness. Do you have any specific solutions or whitelist rules you can share?

Zhong ZhiyuanAug 13

AI pre-review looks good, but the attack surface is actually quite large. If attackers figure out the AI's rule characteristics and deliberately construct code to bypass it, and human reviewers only look at what the AI didn't flag, these vulnerabilities slip through. Have protective measures been considered?